Record#
EV ID |
EV-0441 |
Institution |
The National Archives |
Matter |
Enquiry on BP Properties Ltd v Buckler land dispute records |
Route / regime |
Email · records enquiry |
Their reference |
CAS-313954-Y6C0H3 CRM:052900508; CRM:022601115; CRM:022601127 |
Request date |
31 Jan 2026 |
Statutory deadline |
No statutory deadline applies |
Deadline |
no statutory deadline |
First reply (not an acknowledgement) |
6 Feb 2026 |
Days waited |
6 |
Response class |
“not held” |
Exemptions cited |
none cited |
Redirected to |
Central Land Registry; local/county archives |
Fees or charges named |
— |
Messages |
5 sent · 2 received (0 acknowledgements only) |
Attachments from the institution |
0 archived |
About this page type → Read the Docs · All requests (disclosure record) · Dartboard: disclosure record
Timeline#
Date |
Direction |
Class |
Summary |
Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
31 Jan 2026 |
→ to institution |
request |
Requester asks whether disputed land ownership before 1987 registration is relevant to archival or historical record considerations. |
|
6 Feb 2026 |
← from institution |
redirected elsewhere |
Institution states it is unlikely to hold the requested land case records and directs requester to other bodies and research guides. |
|
6 Feb 2026 |
→ to institution |
clarification given |
Requester clarifies the enquiry concerns BP Properties Ltd v Buckler and asks about archival protocols for disputed land ownership. |
|
6 Feb 2026 |
← from institution |
not held |
Institution explains it does not annotate disputed records and confirms searched judicial series contain no relevant material. |
|
6 Feb 2026 |
→ to institution |
clarification given |
Requester details 1974 proceedings and asks procedural questions about archival silence and incomplete court records. |
|
8 Feb 2026 |
→ to institution |
complaint |
Requester raises concerns of evidence tampering, cites recollection, and asks about Bute Estate and BP corporate records. |
|
8 Feb 2026 |
→ to institution |
clarification given |
Requester corrects a prior date claim, introduces a forensic report, and renews questions about naming and record transfers. |
Note: Institution states relevant judicial series contain no material and does not annotate disputed records.