Record#
Page ID: 567 · Title: Family Reparations & Remedy Roadmap · Evidence status: Not yet labelled — see the Editing Protocol · Version: 0.1.1 · Editing Protocol
Family Reparations & Remedy Roadmap#
Current documentary position — 25 September 2026#
Subject |
Record |
Current position |
|---|---|---|
Parcel A / Parcel B |
Mary (Nancy) Williams’s c.1974 witness statement (Mary (Nancy) Williams testimony) records the 1877 Bute sale to Daniel Thomas that separated the house parcel from the eastern fields, and the 1939 plan shows Parcel B only [EV-0023]. The case drawn from that evidence is that only the fields passed to WGR and BP. No court has ever examined this. The 1938 conveyance and 1939 tenancy plans are being scanned for the Wiki. |
|
1982–83 first registration |
WA231076 / WA240304 · 30 July 2026 HMLR document schedule |
The 30 July schedule lists 43 documents. The 31 December 1969 root conveyance and a free-standing 1971 abstract are not listed. |
HMLR complaint |
25 May 2026 stage-2 decision |
Mr Gill stated that the title was “registered correctly” and no rectification or indemnity was available on the complaint. The decision relied on the 1987 judgment rather than the 1983 registration file. It has been referred to the Independent Complaints Reviewer. |
HMLR file inspection / preservation |
Physical inspection was requested 2–3 June 2026 and repeated in September. As at 25 September the substantive inspection response and formal non-destruction confirmation remained outstanding. |
|
BP v Buckler |
TNA identified YHL/PO/JO/10/11/2536, Judicial Papers A–C 1–63; item 19 concerns B.P. Properties Limited v Buckler. |
|
Heritage / archaeology |
The 1974 measured survey, 1988 listing material, 1990 assessment and 1994 excavation are recorded in separate evidence entries. |
|
Records access |
Outstanding records are identified by repository, reference and requested document. |
Legal sources#
Limitation Act 1980, s.32 — postponement of limitation in cases involving fraud, deliberate concealment or mistake. legislation.gov.uk.
Land Registration Act 2002, Schedule 4 — alteration and rectification of the register. legislation.gov.uk.
Land Registration Act 2002, Schedule 8 — indemnity. legislation.gov.uk.
Land Registration Act 2002, Schedule 1 — overriding interests on first registration, including specified interests of persons in actual occupation. legislation.gov.uk.
CPR 52.30 — reopening of final appeals. Civil Procedure Rules, Part 52.
Human Rights Act 1998, Schedule 1 — Convention rights given effect in domestic law. legislation.gov.uk.
Primary evidence priorities#
Date / reference |
Record sought |
Wiki route |
|---|---|---|
1876–78 |
Bute / Daniel Thomas & Son / Williams conveyancing and quarrying instruments. |
|
15 May 1924 |
Agreement held on the WA231076 schedule. |
|
1928 |
John Williams registration / completion record. |
|
1938 |
WGR conveyance from Bute. |
|
1939 |
DBDT123/7 and plan. |
|
31 Dec 1969 |
WGR → BP Pension Trust conveyance, recited as the root of title but absent from the 30 July 2026 HMLR schedule. |
|
1971 |
Free-standing abstract referred to in the registration history and absent from the 30 July 2026 schedule. |
|
23 May 1975 |
BP Pension Trust → BP Properties conveyance and plan. |
|
1982–83 |
Complete first-registration applications, plans, declarations, certificates, requisitions and supporting deeds. |
|
1987–88 |
Complete House of Lords judicial papers and related appeal records. |
|
2026 |
HMLR inspection, preservation and correspondence record. |
Fresh remedy architecture — 6 October 2026#
Reframing: the case is now divided into… … read more
Reframing: the case is now divided into separate questions: title, registration, judgment, limitation, woodland recovery and public-authority accountability. No single limitation argument is being asked to do all the work.
Limitation Act 1980 s.32: qualifying fraud, deliberate concealment or mistake can postpone limitation until discovery or when it could reasonably have been discovered.
Takhar: a fraud-based challenge requires evidence that fraud affected the obtaining of the judgment; earlier document loss alone is insufficient.
CPR 52.30: reopening a final appeal requires real injustice, exceptional circumstances and no alternative effective remedy.
CPR 31.16: pre-action disclosure may be available where its conditions are met.
Registered land: LRA 2002 s.96 disapplies ordinary Limitation Act s.15 recovery-of-land limitation against registered estates and Schedule 6 governs adverse possession.
Woodland: where primary evidence proves a… … read more
Woodland: where primary evidence proves a precise woodland polygon was already family land, the requested remedy can be framed as declaration/rectification/recovery rather than purchase, subject to the 1994 transfer, consideration, notice and purchaser-protection analysis.
Page version & change log#
Current version: 0.1.1
Version |
Date (UTC) |
Editor (human or agent name) |
Change |
Source / evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
0.1.1 |
2026-10-18T15:17Z |
Sion’s Tab agent |
Footer standardised; earlier log rows carried into this table; no content change |
Editing Protocol, 18 Oct 2026 |
0.1.0 |
2026-10-18T14:27:00+01:00 |
OpenAI-assisted maintenance agent (GPT-6) |
Installed footer log; version tracking begins at 0.1.0; this does not reconstruct earlier revisions. CURRENT VERSION: 0.1.0. |
Saved through WordPress API; public rendering not individually checked. |
Agents and editors: follow the Editing Protocol.